Author Topic: Jurassic World Movie  (Read 4230 times)

akitalover

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
    • View Profile
    • Pet Street Mall
Jurassic World Movie
« on: March 15, 2017, 04:57:57 AM »
This movie scared my cousins but they do love dinosour.


Advicot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 822
  • Life finds a Way!
    • View Profile
  • Animal: Eastern Star-nosed mole
Re: Jurassic World Movie
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2019, 06:13:33 PM »
Entertaining but very inaccurate.  ::)
Don't I take long uploading photos!

sirenia

  • Reviewer
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 433
  • Born to be mild!
    • View Profile
  • Animal: Wolf
Re: Jurassic World Movie
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2020, 11:36:05 AM »
Not bad at all, but hardly a palaeontologically accurate show.

Arctinus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
    • View Profile
  • Animal: Lynx
Re: Jurassic World Movie
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2020, 04:03:39 PM »
The dinosaurs in Jurassic World (and Jurassic Park, obviously) are far from being scientifically accurate, but I still love the movies as I grew up with the Jurassic Park ones.  ;D And besides, the dinosaurs in the movies are genetically modified anyway.  :P

If you loved Jurassic Park, you should check out Jurassic World: Camp Cretacious. It's an animated series, but dinos are top-notch (CGI-wise, of course) and it's been confirmed that the story is Jurassic World canon. This means that we get some insight into other things that happened during the first (maybe also the second movie in season 2) movie that we didn't get to see in on-screen.  ^-^
Until one has loved an animal a part of one's soul remains unawakened.

~Anatole France

JimoAi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 761
    • View Profile
  • Animal: Reef Manta ray
Re: Jurassic World Movie
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2020, 02:27:56 AM »
I despised all jurassic movies except the 1993 Jurassic Park

bmathison1972

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4433
    • View Profile
Re: Jurassic World Movie
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2020, 01:34:08 PM »
Well, it depends on how you view them. If you view them as natural history documentaries you will be disappointed. If you watch them for what they are, science fiction monster movies, you'll enjoy them much better LOL.

Frankly, when the first JP came out, I was disappointed, mainly because the way the director butchered half the characters from how they were in the novel. But the first is still the best. The first Jurassic World was also fun, but the second was horrible (IMO).

sirenia

  • Reviewer
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 433
  • Born to be mild!
    • View Profile
  • Animal: Wolf
Re: Jurassic World Movie
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2020, 07:45:33 PM »
Always gonna be tricky adapting a novel like that. Lucky with what we got.

Physeter macrocephalus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Save the whales.
    • View Profile
  • Animal: Snow Leopard
Re: Jurassic World Movie
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2020, 06:16:12 AM »
JP raptors get more innaccurate trought the years the first 1993 one is still innaccurate but more accurate then others because it doesnt look like the real animal.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2020, 02:31:23 PM by Physeter macrocephalus »

stargatedalek

  • Reviewer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 871
    • View Profile
Re: Jurassic World Movie
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2020, 06:53:17 AM »
JP raptors get more innaccurate trought the years the first 1993 one is still innaccurate but more accurate then others because it looks like velociraptor of that time.
It really doesn't though. The proportions, size, and skull shape have never matched up with a real Dromaeosaur. Aside from feathers Velociraptors appearance was pretty well understood long before Jurassic Park was made.

Physeter macrocephalus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Save the whales.
    • View Profile
  • Animal: Snow Leopard
Re: Jurassic World Movie
« Reply #9 on: December 19, 2020, 01:46:35 PM »
JP raptors get more innaccurate trought the years the first 1993 one is still innaccurate but more accurate then others because it looks like velociraptor of that time.
It really doesn't though. The proportions, size, and skull shape have never matched up with a real Dromaeosaur. Aside from feathers Velociraptors appearance was pretty well understood long before Jurassic Park was made.

Well in 1993 feathers study never made.

stargatedalek

  • Reviewer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 871
    • View Profile
Re: Jurassic World Movie
« Reply #10 on: December 19, 2020, 07:03:55 PM »
JP raptors get more innaccurate trought the years the first 1993 one is still innaccurate but more accurate then others because it looks like velociraptor of that time.
It really doesn't though. The proportions, size, and skull shape have never matched up with a real Dromaeosaur. Aside from feathers Velociraptors appearance was pretty well understood long before Jurassic Park was made.

Well in 1993 feathers study never made.
I'm saying there are many things fundamentally and objectively inaccurate about the JP Velociraptors that were known prior to the films production.

Saying the JP raptors aren't accurate to real Velociraptors because they don't have feathers is like saying the dog creatures from Ghostbusters aren't accurate to real wolves because they don't have fur. There are far more fundamental differences long before feathers are even in consideration.

 



SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal